- #Corel photo paint vs paint shop pro how to
- #Corel photo paint vs paint shop pro update
- #Corel photo paint vs paint shop pro pro
- #Corel photo paint vs paint shop pro psp
Color, gradation, exposure, everything, is way off. It gives the impression that only a tiny thumbnail version of the RAW file has been opened and then resized upward 1,000%. But the images look like crap and no amount of tweaking can fix the problem.
#Corel photo paint vs paint shop pro psp
The monitor profiler is much improved compared with the one in PSP 8.
#Corel photo paint vs paint shop pro update
Since I installed update 10.01, CM works the way I would expect.
When PSP X was first released, color management was strange and buggy. The other major 16-bit limitation is that layer blend modes other than "normal" are limited to 8-bit images. I usually stay in 16 bit for major levels adjustment and color balance and then switch to 8-bit for tweaking and for any plugins. It does not support plugins for 16-bit images. Many commands can use 16 bit, but a couple of my favorite (adjust histogram, and black/white point color balance) are 8 bit, but parts of those functions have been included in some other 16-bit commands. I think that its raw converter is somewhat rudimentary, and it expects that the user will adjust the shot with the normal PSP commands. PSP X does have a raw converter built in as well as coming bundled with RSE. I've used PSP 8 and recently upgraded to PSP X. Elements 3 and 4 also support Adobe Camera Raw if you need that, and include a scaled-down version of PSCS2's color management and some 16-bit support. If you need a good raw converter, consider RawShooter Essentials. Don't consider upgrading to PSP X until Corel finishes it (I suspect that won't happen until at least PSP XI). If you don't need color management, 16-bit color, or good raw conversion, I'd suggest sticking with PSP 8. It's mainly a matter of adjusting to the differences in user interface and approach. That's mostly because the basic techniques are the same as in PSP. I actually didn't find the learning curve for Photoshop CS2 as steep as I expected. But PSP has a very useful subset of Photoshop's advanced features, some of which Elements lacks (including layers, adjustment layers, curves, and levels), and in a nicer user interface. Photoshop is bloated in both size and price, but buried in the bloat is bound to be some tool that is exactly what you need for any situation. Photoshop also includes "Adobe Camera Raw," a very good converter for digital camera raw files. Photoshop has numerous other features that can make photo editing easier, including nearly-complete support for 16-bit color and a very useful tool for extracting shadow and highlight detail. PSP 8 supports the rather primitive form of color management that's part of Windows. That's a real shame, since otherwise PSP X has some visible usability improvements over PSP 8. Corel advertised these features in PSP X, but released them in unfinished beta form.
It also lets you use color spaces other than the sRGB that PSP supports, which can produce more colorful and accurate prints. That matters if you're making prints, as it can ensure that prints match what you see on the screen as closely as possible. What Photoshop has and PSP lacks is mature, functioning color management. PSP 8 is a good version that has most of Photoshop's important features for photo editing. I used PSP for nearly seven years, and only switched to PS when I upgraded to PSP X and found Corel's implementation of color management and 16-bit color severely disappointing (my real opinion wouldn't be suitable for family viewing). With Photoshop, I have the best possible chance of getting a quick answer for anything I will need to do, and I save money every time that happens.
#Corel photo paint vs paint shop pro how to
I'd already learned 'way back in the 80s working with applications like WordStar that I didn't need to learn EVERYTHING the application could do, but I did need to be able to quickly find out how to do any PARTICULAR thing.
#Corel photo paint vs paint shop pro pro
I spent some time adapting the Photoshop answers to Paint Shop Pro, but I realized on this and other occasions that I'd wasted more than enough time inventing my own wheels with PaintShop Pro than it would have cost me to buy Photoshop. I Googled for the problem and found dozens of responses for Photoshop, but none for Paint Shop. When I last used Paint Shop Pro, I was trying to attain a certain retouching effect, more or less "inventing the wheel" myself. While there is quite a bit of 3rd party support for Paint Shop Pro, it's nowhere near the level that exists for Photoshop. Working professionally, my primary reason for shifting to Photoshop was 3rd party support (not only 3rd party application and plug-in development, but also informational resources from both commercial and private sources).
0 kommentar(er)
